I'll wait for the official fix. Should I still file a bug? On 1/6/06, Marco Bonetti <mbonetti at gmail.com> wrote: > > Matthew, > > I think I see what is going on here. The links of the items on those > feeds are a tad too long for Gregarius. > > It's a very stupid design flaw of mine, back in the 0.1 days, when I > designed the database schema and decided that items with links longer > than 255 chars shouldn't make it into the database. > > (You know the saying, 255 chars should be enough for everyone.) > > We've been discussing this problem a couple weeks ago, and I hope we > have a solution up for 0.5.4 > > In the meantime, there is a quick work-around, which involves some > database schema changing and patching a file. If you feel so inclined > let me know and I'll route you through the process. > > -m > > > > On 1/6/06, Matthew Gregg <matthew.gregg at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm running Gregarius SVN and recently it has stopped seeing any new > posts > > from http://www.indeed.com feeds. > > Here is an example feed that no longer updates: > > http://rss.indeed.com/rss?q=python > > > > Any ideas? > > -- > > D'oh! > > _______________________________________________ > > gregarius-dev mailing list > > gregarius-dev at sinless.org > > http://sinless.org/mailman/listinfo/gregarius-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gregarius-dev mailing list > gregarius-dev at sinless.org > http://sinless.org/mailman/listinfo/gregarius-dev > -- D'oh! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://sinless.org/pipermail/gregarius-dev/attachments/20060106/ee4ebe30/attachment.html