Julien, I'm not quite sure I understand what is going on here. Do you mean all those feeds which have been deprecated have unread items which are counted as unread, and which weren't counted before? Or are those read items which are now counted in the total count? -m On 9/25/05, Julien Mudry <julien.mudry at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > I just upgraded to the latest svn version 904 (yeah, I like living on > the edge ;-) ). And I nearly got an heart attack when I got back to my > web aggregator: the total of unread items was five times higher than > the second before, totalling more than 10 thousand! > > Then I realised that I deprecated quite a few feeds lately to get down > to a more bearable level of unread items. And that the unread total > was around that level before deprecation. So, my guess is that the > changeset 893 (described as "Optimization: optimized the sql query in > unreadCount, cached the result") may well be the culprit for this > change of behaviour. > > Marco: is this the new wanted way of counting unread items (ie, > including unread but deprecated items in the total)? It will seem > strange to users, as the total could be way higher than the items they > can see in the page. > > Regards, > > julien > > _______________________________________________ > gregarius-dev mailing list > gregarius-dev at sinless.org > http://sinless.org/mailman/listinfo/gregarius-dev >