> > I already asked mister Bonetti about an ajax drag & drop as dotclear > > blog does in it's category folder management :o it's quite fun :o, But > > if it's too much work nevermind :) > > Yes this would be fun :). If we have a good ajax library it would be much > easier to code. > I have a semi-working implementation for drag'n'dropping feeds: its done via an unreleased plugin. You can test it on the demo site ( rss.gregarius.net ) where you can reorder feeds in the feed sidecolumn: feel free to test, it doesn't store the new order yet. :) The only problem I'm having is that I can't seem to move feeds across folders, and I haven't had time to properly debug the script and see what is going on. If anyone is interested to pick this up please let me know. > > you can subscribe to this feed at > http://hicksdesign.co.uk/index.html?rss=1§ion=journal and this URL > works in gregarius. If you try to subscribe using the feed given on the > page the website does a re-direct and gregarius ends up going to the > wrong url. I will take a look at this. (I think the ? mark in the URL is > confusing it). > The server seems to issue a redirect with a "Location: /?rss=1§ion=journal" HTTP header, which is quite odd. We could support this in Gregarius, but I wonder how standard that behavior is, and if it's worth the time needed to implement and test. AFAIK Jon Hicks is the only one doing this, but I could be wrong. > > Why does "admin section" not "wearing" the selected theme ? is it on > > purpose or just not done for the moment > > I had the same thought but then I realised that interaction with the > admin section is much less compared to intereaction with the main > gregarius section. I wrote this somewhere on trac but I cant find it now. > In fact the admin doesn't use the specified theme because it wasn't switched to the object-oriented model yet. Much like what happens in WordPress' admin component, which uses a default "hard-coded" theme. > > Will there be "sub folders" ? > > I thought martey's patch for categories was suppossed to replace > sub-folder. (Ticket 96) > Yes, and proper sub folders are way to complicated to implement right now. Besides, I'd like to freeze new features and orient my efforts on fixing the last bugs scheduled for 0.5.1, then push out 0.5.2 as soon as possible. And start working on a first multi-user hack right after that. (My current stance is: one table-set per user, by the way :) -m