> Ah, cool. By implementing the second method, wouldn't it require a join with > almost every query of table? Or do you mean something like how 'config' works, > where you can just look it up the values by key? Exactly! I think we'd load the whole table content into a global object which could be queried by channel_id and key. And thank you for offering, but I think I'll take care of this myself tomorrow, if I find some time!